1993. The Independent interviews Osama Bin Laden, who was now apparently a simple "construction engineer and an agriculturalist" in Sudan.

All those interested in American left-wing propaganda must read the attached article! More so as it was penned by Robert Fisk, possibly the most prestigious western journalist in the Middle East over the past half century.

This whitewashing of Osama bin Laden in the early 1990s was a crass reframing of him as a visionary, a pious Saudi millionaire, building roads in Sudan and devoting himself to development. Conveniently ignored is that bin Laden was, at that very moment, laying the global foundations of al-Qaeda. This omission cannot be an accident, by then, al-Qaeda was already operational. Whether Fisk was in on the deception or not, really doesn't matter.

Part of what makes this narrative manipulation so egregious is the timing. The article appeared just a few months after the first World Trade Center bombing, an attack linked to bin Laden’s growing network. Global jihad was already underway. But the West wasn’t about to show their hand. Bin Laden, after all, had been their creature, created, funded, trained and armed by the CIA during the U.S.-backed Mujahideen struggle against the Soviets in Afghanistan. They were not about to disclose their asset nor discuss the realities of what would become known later as the Global War on Terror.

Today, as previously discussed, the same is unfolding with the "diversity friendly" Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), the Syrian militant group that emerged from al-Qaeda’s affiliate, al-Nusra Front. Like bin Laden in Sudan, HTS has rebranded itself, presenting an image across the entire western media of pragmatism and governance in Syria’s northwest. Western policymakers, along with Turkey, who both heavily support HTS, have encouraged this narrative, portraying the group as a stabilizing force and a counterweight to ISIS and Assad. The United States has quietly supported this dynamic, using HTS as a proxy to maintain influence in the region.

This is not about misunderstanding HTS; it is deliberate. HTS remains steeped in extremist ideology, ruling through fear, enforcing harsh Islamic law, and violently suppressing dissent. But just as bin Laden’s darker truths were obscured to serve geopolitical aims, HTS’s ongoing extremism is overlooked to present it as a “manageable” ally. Turkey’s backing of HTS has been instrumental, providing resources and political cover as Ankara uses the group to exert control over Idlib and counter Kurdish forces. And the United States sowing chaos wherever it can.

For those who dare to look, the parallels are plain as day. In the '90s, bin Laden’s whitewashing allowed him to consolidate his networks, ultimately leading to 9/11 (whether Al Qaeda as simple cover story, patsy, or perpetrator we may never really be sure). Today, HTS’s rebranding empowers another extremist force, with Turkey and the United States happy to utilize an extremist as long as they can say "he is our son of a bitch". The people of the country (Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Ukraine, ...), and long term consequences don't ever enter into the calculations.

The whitewashing of bin Laden, soon after the first World Trade Center bombing, wasn’t just a journalistic failure—it was all part of the plan. The rehabilitation of HTS follows the same cynical logic, with Turkey and America propping up a group whose true nature is all too clear. The cost of this will be paid by the Syrian people in blood.

Just the latest iteration of the American Democrats Global War on Terror,
a Global War WITH Terror....

***